LIFE ISSUES FORUM (WORD
FORMAT)
November 4, 2005
Roe's False Freedom
By Deirdre A. McQuade, M.A., M.Div.
Recently, The Washington Post ran a
revealing opinion piece by Patricia Bauer,
the mother of a college-age daughter with
Down syndrome. She writes:
"Whenever I am out with Margaret, I'm
conscious that she represents a group whose
ranks are shrinking because of the wide
availability of prenatal testing and
abortion. I don't know how many pregnancies
are terminated because of prenatal diagnoses
of Down syndrome, but some studies estimate
80 to 90 percent."
She raises an important question: How can
society tacitly write off a whole group of
people due to their prenatally-diagnosed
disabilities?
Her heartfelt account shows how our society
condones eugenics culturally, if not
explicitly in law - as if destroying a
disabled child in utero were more
compassionate than giving her the gift of
life.
She recounts her dinner party conversation
with an elite ethics program director. The
ethicist said that "prospective parents have
a moral obligation...to terminate their
pregnancy to avoid bringing forth a child
with a disability, because it was immoral to
subject a child to the kind of suffering he
or she would have to endure."
What an incredible distortion!
Ms. Bauer's story is one sign we have moved
beyond the false freedom of "choice" to a
more coercive culture. Abortion is seen as
the "responsible" option for parents
expecting a child with disabilities, whether
or not they are life-threatening. The
"choice" of abortion then becomes a "duty"
for mothers whose children's lives are
considered not worth living.
Even much-wanted, planned-for children are
at risk of being aborted if they are
diagnosed with a genetic anomaly. In raising
the option of "termination," some doctors
abuse their medical authority and lay a
heavy burden on already distressed parents.
Well-meaning friends, family and pastors may
concur, justifying abortion by saying it is
better for the family.
Those who give birth to children with
special needs are sometimes seen as ignorant
(as in, "You know you could have prevented
this, right?") -- or worse, as selfish,
unethical, or unloving ("You let this child
be born only to suffer. How loving is
that?").
This growing attitude is hardly liberating
to women. Indeed, Ms. Bauer's story should
make even the most pro-choice citizens take
a hard second look at abortion, and the
infamous decision that opened the
floodgates, Roe v. Wade.
Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Ted
Kennedy (D-MA) have taken an important step
on behalf of parents expecting children with
Down syndrome and other genetic anomalies.
The Prenatally-diagnosed Conditions
Awareness Act (S.609) will ensure access to
services and information often not available
to parents at the time of their child's
diagnosis. Parents could then have vital
information at their fingertips, welcome
their sick or special needs child into their
family, and prepare responsibly for her
upbringing.
The proposed act is a sign of hope that
should inspire other creative,
life-supporting measures. It is time to
build a world where human life is always
loved and defended ... and to care for those
we encounter along the way, especially the
most vulnerable.
Deirdre McQuade is
director of planning and information,
Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, U.S.
Conference of Catholic Bishops.
USCCB Pro-Life Secretariat